
Extra Precautions were taken in the burial of Jesus
after his crucifixion:
Jewish Temple Guard. They were placed in
10-man units. The discipline of the guard was quite good. For instance, if a man
was caught asleep, he was beaten and burned right on the spot with his own
clothes. If they had been guarding the tomb, they certainly wouldn't have fallen
asleep.
Roman Guard. The Greek terms used in Matt.
27:65 can refer only to the Roman Guard. What were they like? T.L. Tucker
says they carried five different weapons; certainly not the traditional picture
of men with spears in mini skirts. They were a four-to-16-man, highly-trained
and disciplined unit. Each man was able to protect six feet of ground against an
entire invading army. Any disappearance of the body would have meant death to
the guard. Do you think the disciples could have stolen the body against these
men? Never!
Matthew 28:11-15.
This explanation leaves us with a lot of questions.
His enemies set a guard to keep Him from
disappearing. They could also have produced the body at any time to squelch the
reports of the risen Christ ("Here's the body; He is not risen"). But
they didn't!
His friends had neither the inclination,
courage, or the power to do this. They were in no mood to do it! Furthermore,
would they want to perpetuate the lies of an imposter? Would they die for a lie?
A known lie would not have caused the transformation of these men.
Could this be true? If so, everyone went to the wrong tomb—the soldiers, the disciples, other Jews, the angel. Even today, people are going to the wrong tomb. Do you think Joseph, the tomb's owner, also forgot and went to the wrong tomb? Wouldn't he verify his empty tomb? The evidence is that the disciples and the women knew where the tomb was located (Matt. 27:61).
This theory proposes that Jesus didn't really die; He
swooned. He lost a lot of blood and then fainted. After going through the
torment of His trial and the cross, He didn't die. The damp tomb healed Him. Is
there a rebuttal to this theory?
This is proposed by Hugh Schoenfield in his book, The
Passover Plot. The theory states that Jesus plotted a very timely and
detailed plan to arrange what appeared to be His resurrection. Here's how
Schoenfield outlines the plot.
Jesus took into His confidence a young Joseph of
Arimathea. Knowing the Old Testament prophecies concerning the Messiah, Jesus
ordered His life in such a way as to fulfill them. For example, Jesus arranged a
feigned death on the cross by being administered a drug when the vinegar was
offered. Then after He passed out from the drug, Joseph took His body to one of
his tombs. When the effects of the drug wore off, Jesus appeared alive and
revealed himself as the Messiah.
The problem with Schoenfield's theory is the selective distortion of the
facts. Why did he select some segments of the biblical account as true, but not
all? For example, he accepts the story of the spear, but notice what he rejects,
ignores and is ignorant of:
How probable is it that one person could fulfill
within his lifetime, 300+ specific events, all of which were written before he
was born? Fulfilling the prophecies Jesus did was
statistically improbable—one chance in "2 with 110 zeros after it".
A doctoral student from Ohio University, doing his
dissertation in mathematics, calculated the probability that all the monkeys in
Africa could run over a single typewriter and, without error, retype all the
books in the English language. The probability this could happen is one chance
in "2 with 110 zeros after it" In other words, it is more probable
that all the monkeys in Africa could perform the above feat, than it is that
Christ within His lifetime could fulfill 333 specific events prophesied before
He was born.
The success of the church can be traced back to the city of
Jerusalem. It thrived in the very city where Jesus was crucified and buried.
Thousands believed the first sermons which were preached a few minutes' walk
from the tomb (Acts 2:41; 4:4).
The Christian Sunday is a phenomenon. The decision to
change "the day of worship" is very significant! The early church was
made up of devout Jews, fanatical about observing the Sabbath. They believed
they would incur the wrath of God if they broke it, yet they changed all those
years of training and began to worship on Sunday—to honor the anniversary of
Jesus' resurrection 52 times a year. The only explanation for this is that they
saw the risen Lord.
These ordinances are all circumstantial evidences of the
resurrection, because they too find their meaning in the death and resurrection
of Jesus Christ.
Baptism pictures salvation (Rom. 6:1-10); particularly our identification, in
a positive way, with Christ's death and resurrection.
Likewise, communion symbolizes Christ's death and resurrection. "How can
a great joy accompany the acknowledgment of the horrifying death of his
religion's founder, save the redeeming fact of a subsequent resurrection?"
Josh McDowell, Ibid., page 108.
Consider the phenomenon of transformed lives.
The early Christians had no visible (earthly) benefits from their
wholehearted and total allegiance to Jesus.
Jesus' family members were the hardest to convince but became
followers—Acts 1:14b.
The disciples no longer denied or ran, but became fearless followers,
leaders, and martyrs. They were willing to die for their faith in Jesus and His
bodily resurrection.
Saul of Tarsus, a fanatical persecutor of Christians, became an
apostle and missionary.
Your life. Has He changed and transformed you?
Evidence That Demands A Verdict, by Josh
McDowell, Vol. 1, Here's Life Publishers, 1986.
The Resurrection Factor, by Josh McDowell, Here's Life
Publishers, 1981. Note: Much of this material was taken from these books.
They are an excellent source for a defense of our faith.